English
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Harvoni (ledispavir 90 mg / sofosbuvir 400 mg) – Summary of product characteristics - J05AX65

Updated on site: 07-Oct-2017

Medication nameHarvoni
ATC CodeJ05AX65
Substanceledispavir 90 mg / sofosbuvir 400 mg
ManufacturerGilead Sciences International Ltd

This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions. See section 4.8 for how to report adverse reactions.

1.NAME OF THE MEDICINAL PRODUCT

Harvoni 90 mg/400 mg film-coated tablets

2.QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE COMPOSITION

Each film-coated tablet contains 90 mg ledipasvir and 400 mg sofosbuvir.

Excipients with known effect:

Each film-coated tablet contains 156.8 mg of lactose (as monohydrate) and 261 micrograms of sunset yellow FCF aluminium lake.

For the full list of excipients, see section 6.1.

3.PHARMACEUTICAL FORM

Film-coated tablet.

Orange, diamond-shaped, film-coated tablet of dimensions 19 mm x 10 mm, debossed with “GSI” on one side and “7985” on the other side.

4.CLINICAL PARTICULARS

4.1Therapeutic indications

Harvoni is indicated for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC) in adults (see sections 4.2, 4.4 and 5.1).

For hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype-specific activity see sections 4.4 and 5.1.

4.2Posology and method of administration

Harvoni treatment should be initiated and monitored by a physician experienced in the management of patients with CHC.

Posology

The recommended dose of Harvoni is one tablet once daily with or without food (see section 5.2).

Ribavirin Dose*
1,000 mg per day for patients < 75 kg and 1,200 mg for those weighing ≥ 75 kg
Starting dose of 600 mg, which can be titrated up to a maximum of 1,000/1,200 mg (1,000 mg for patients weighing < 75 kg and 1,200 mg for patients weighing ≥ 75 kg) if well tolerated. If the starting dose is not well tolerated, the dose should be reduced as clinically indicated based on haemoglobin levels

Table 1: Recommended treatment duration for Harvoni and the recommended use of co-administered ribavirin for certain subgroups

Patient population

Treatment and duration

(including HIV co-infected patients)

 

Patients with genotype 1, 4, 5 or 6 CHC

 

 

 

 

Harvoni for 12 weeks.

 

- Harvoni for 8 weeks may be considered in previously

Patients without cirrhosis

untreated genotype 1-infected patients (see section 5.1,

ION-3 study).

 

 

 

 

Harvoni + ribavirinA for 12 weeks

 

or

 

Harvoni (without ribavirin) for 24 weeks.

Patients with compensated cirrhosis

- Harvoni (without ribavirin) for 12 weeks may be

 

 

considered for patients deemed at low risk for clinical

 

disease progression and who have subsequent retreatment

 

options (see section 4.4).

 

Harvoni + ribavirinA for 12 weeks (see section 5.1).

Patients who are post-liver transplant

- Harvoni (without ribavirin) for 12 weeks (in patients

without cirrhosis or with compensated

without cirrhosis) or 24 weeks (in patients with cirrhosis)

cirrhosis

may be considered for patients who are ineligible for or

 

intolerant to ribavirin.

 

Harvoni + ribavirinB for 12 weeks (see section 5.1)

Patients with decompensated cirrhosis

- Harvoni (without ribavirin) for 24 weeks may be

irrespective of transplant status

considered in patients who are ineligible for or intolerant

 

to ribavirin.

Patients with genotype 3 CHC

 

 

 

Patients with compensated cirrhosis and/or

Harvoni + ribavirinA for 24 weeks (see sections 4.4 and 5.1).

prior treatment failure

 

AWeight based ribavirin (< 75 kg = 1,000 mg and ≥ 75 kg = 1,200 mg), administered orally in two divided doses with food.

BFor ribavirin dosing recommendations in patients with decompensated cirrhosis, see table 2 below.

Table 2: Guidance for ribavirin dosing when administered with Harvoni to patients with decompensated cirrhosis

Patient

Child-Pugh-Turcotte (CPT) Class B cirrhosis pre-transplant

CPT Class C cirrhosis pre-transplant

CPT Class B or C cirrhosis post- transplant

* - If a more normalized dose of ribavirin (by weight and renal function) cannot be reached for reasons of tolerability, 24 weeks of Harvoni + ribavirin should be considered in order to minimize the risk for relapse.

When ribavirin is added to Harvoni, refer also to the Summary of Product Characteristics of ribavirin.

Dose modification of ribavirin in patients taking 1,000-1,200 mg daily

If Harvoni is used in combination with ribavirin and a patient has a serious adverse reaction potentially related to ribavirin, the ribavirin dose should be modified or discontinued, if appropriate, until the adverse reaction abates or decreases in severity. Table 3 provides guidelines for dose modifications and discontinuation based on the patient’s haemoglobin concentration and cardiac status.

Table 3: Ribavirin dose modification guideline for co-administration with Harvoni

Laboratory values

Reduce ribavirin dose to

Discontinue ribavirin if:

 

600 mg/day if:

 

Haemoglobin in patients with no

< 10 g/dL

< 8.5 g/dL

cardiac disease

 

 

Haemoglobin in patients with history

≥ 2 g/dL decrease in haemoglobin

< 12 g/dL despite 4 weeks at

of stable cardiac disease

during any 4-week treatment

reduced dose

 

period

 

Once ribavirin has been withheld due to either a laboratory abnormality or clinical manifestation, an attempt may be made to restart ribavirin at 600 mg daily and further increase the dose to 800 mg daily. However, it is not recommended that ribavirin be increased to the originally assigned dose (1,000 mg to 1,200 mg daily).

Patients should be instructed that if vomiting occurs within 5 hours of dosing an additional tablet should be taken. If vomiting occurs more than 5 hours after dosing, no further dose is needed (see section 5.1).

If a dose is missed and it is within 18 hours of the normal time, patients should be instructed to take the tablet as soon as possible and then patients should take the next dose at the usual time. If it is after 18 hours then patients should be instructed to wait and take the next dose at the usual time. Patients should be instructed not to take a double dose.

Elderly

No dose adjustment is warranted for elderly patients (see section 5.2).

Renal impairment

No dose adjustment of Harvoni is required for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. The safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir has not been assessed in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring haemodialysis (see section 5.2).

Hepatic impairment

No dose adjustment of Harvoni is required for patients with mild, moderate or severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh-Turcotte [CPT] class A, B or C) (see section 5.2). Safety and efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir have been established in patients with decompensated cirrhosis (see section 5.1).

Paediatric population

The safety and efficacy of Harvoni in children and adolescents aged less than 18 years have not yet been established. No data are available.

Method of administration

For oral use.

Patients should be instructed to swallow the tablet whole with or without food. Due to the bitter taste, it is recommended that the film-coated tablet is not chewed or crushed (see section 5.2).

4.3Contraindications

Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients listed in section 6.1.

Co-administration with rosuvastatin (see section 4.5).

Use with potent P-gp inducers

Medicinal products that are potent P-glycoprotein (P-gp) inducers in the intestine (rifampicin, rifabutin, St. John’s wort [Hypericum perforatum], carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin). Co-administration will significantly decrease ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plasma concentrations and could result in loss of efficacy of Harvoni (see section 4.5).

4.4Special warnings and precautions for use

Harvoni should not be administered concomitantly with other medicinal products containing sofosbuvir.

Genotype-specific activity

Concerning recommended regimens with different HCV genotypes, see section 4.2. Concerning genotype-specific virological and clinical activity, see section 5.1.

The clinical data to support the use of Harvoni in patients infected with HCV genotype 3 are limited (see section 5.1). The relative efficacy of a 12-week regimen consisting of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir

+ ribavirin, compared to a 24-week regimen of sofosbuvir + ribavirin has not been investigated. A conservative 24 weeks of therapy is advised in all treatment-experienced genotype 3 patients and those treatment-naïve genotype 3 patients with cirrhosis (see section 4.2). In genotype 3-infection, the use of Harvoni (always in combination with ribavirin) should only be considered for patients who are deemed at high risk for clinical disease progression and who do not have alternative treatment options.

The clinical data to support the use of Harvoni in patients infected with HCV genotype 2 and 6 are limited (see section 5.1).

Severe bradycardia and heart block

Cases of severe bradycardia and heart block have been observed when Harvoni is used with concomitant amiodarone with or without other drugs that lower heart rate. The mechanism is not established.

The concomitant use of amiodarone was limited through the clinical development of sofosbuvir plus direct-acting antivirals (DAAs). Cases are potentially life threatening, therefore amiodarone should only be used in patients on Harvoni when other alternative anti-arrhythmic treatments are not tolerated or are contraindicated.

Should concomitant use of amiodarone be considered necessary it is recommended that patients are closely monitored when initiating Harvoni. Patients who are identified as being high risk of bradyarrhythmia should be continuously monitored for 48 hours in an appropriate clinical setting.

Due to the long half-life of amiodarone, appropriate monitoring should also be carried out for patients who have discontinued amiodarone within the past few months and are to be initiated on Harvoni.

All patients receiving Harvoni in combination with amiodarone with or without other drugs that lower heart rate should also be warned of the symptoms of bradycardia and heart block and should be advised to seek medical advice urgently should they experience them.

Treatment of patients with prior exposure to HCV direct-acting antivirals

In patients who fail treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, selection of NS5A resistance mutations that substantially reduce the susceptibility to ledipasvir is seen in the majority of cases (see section 5.1). Limited data indicate that such NS5A mutations do not revert on long-term follow-up. There are presently no data to support the effectiveness of retreatment of patients who have failed ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with a subsequent regimen that contains an NS5A inhibitor. Similarly, there are presently no data to support the effectiveness of NS3/4A protease inhibitors in patients who previously failed prior therapy that included an NS3/4A protease inhibitor. Such patients may therefore be dependent on other drug classes for clearance of HCV infection. Consequently, consideration should be given to longer treatment for patients with uncertain subsequent retreatment options.

Renal impairment

No dose adjustment of Harvoni is required for patients with mild or moderate renal impairment. The safety of Harvoni has not been assessed in patients with severe renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or end stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring

haemodialysis. When Harvoni is used in combination with ribavirin refer also to the Summary of Product Characteristics for ribavirin for patients with creatinine clearance (CrCl) < 50 mL/min (see section 5.2).

Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and/or who are awaiting liver transplant or post-liver transplant The efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in genotype 5 and genotype 6 HCV-infected patients with decompensated cirrhosis and/or who are awaiting liver transplant or post-liver transplant has not been investigated. Treatment with Harvoni should be guided by an assessment of the potential benefits and risks for the individual patient.

Use with moderate P-gp inducers

Medicinal products that are moderate P-gp inducers in the intestine (e.g. oxcarbazepine) may decrease ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plasma concentrations leading to reduced therapeutic effect of Harvoni. Co-administration of such medicinal products is not recommended with Harvoni (see section 4.5).

Use with certain HIV antiretroviral regimens

Harvoni has been shown to increase tenofovir exposure, especially when used together with an HIV regimen containing tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and a pharmacokinetic enhancer (ritonavir or cobicistat). The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the setting of Harvoni and a pharmacokinetic enhancer has not been established. The potential risks and benefits associated with co-administration of Harvoni with the fixed-dose combination tablet containing elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or tenofovir disoproxil fumarate given in conjunction with a boosted HIV protease inhibitor (e.g. atazanavir or darunavir) should be considered, particularly in patients at increased risk of renal dysfunction. Patients receiving Harvoni concomitantly with elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and a boosted HIV protease inhibitor should be monitored for tenofovir- associated adverse reactions. Refer to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, or elvitegravir/cobicistat/emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate Summary of Product Characteristics for recommendations on renal monitoring.

Use with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors

Co-administration of Harvoni and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) can significantly increase the concentration of the statin, which increases the risk of myopathy and rhabdomyolysis (see section 4.5).

HCV/HBV (hepatitis B virus) co-infection

Cases of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation, some of them fatal, have been reported during or after treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents. HBV screening should be performed in all patients before initiation of treatment. HBV/HCV co-infected patients are at risk of HBV reactivation, and should therefore be monitored and managed according to current clinical guidelines.

Paediatric population

Harvoni is not recommended for use in children and adolescents under 18 years of age because the safety and efficacy have not been established in this population.

Excipients

Harvoni contains the azo colouring agent sunset yellow FCF aluminium lake (E110), which may cause allergic reactions. It also contains lactose. Consequently, patients with rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, the Lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption should not take this medicinal product.

4.5Interaction with other medicinal products and other forms of interaction

As Harvoni contains ledipasvir and sofosbuvir, any interactions that have been identified with these active substances individually may occur with Harvoni.

Potential for Harvoni to affect other medicinal products

Ledipasvir is an in vitro inhibitor of drug transporter P-gp and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and may increase intestinal absorption of co-administered substrates for these transporters. In vitro data indicate that ledipasvir may be a weak inducer of metabolising enzymes such as CYP3A4, CYP2C and UGT1A1. Compounds that are substrates of these enzymes may have decreased plasma concentrations when co-administered with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. In vitro ledipasvir inhibits intestinal CYP3A4 and UGT1A1. Medicinal products that have a narrow therapeutic range and which are metabolised by these isoenzymes should be used with caution and carefully monitored.

Potential for other medicinal products to affect Harvoni

Ledipasvir and sofosbuvir are substrates of drug transporter P-gp and BCRP while GS-331007 is not.

Medicinal products that are potent P-gp inducers (rifampicin, rifabutin, St. John’s wort, carbamazepine, phenobarbital and phenytoin) may significantly decrease ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plasma concentrations leading to reduced therapeutic effect of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and thus are contraindicated with Harvoni (see section 4.3). Medicinal products that are moderate P-gp inducers in the intestine (e.g. oxcarbazepine) may decrease ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plasma concentrations leading to reduced therapeutic effect of Harvoni. Co-administration with such medicinal products is not recommended with Harvoni (see section 4.4). Co-administration with medicinal products that inhibit P-gp and/or BCRP may increase ledipasvir and sofosbuvir plasma concentrations without increasing GS-331007 plasma concentration; Harvoni may be co-administered with P-gp and/or BCRP inhibitors. Clinically significant medicinal product interactions with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir mediated by CYP450s or UGT1A1 enzymes are not expected.

Patients treated with vitamin K antagonists

As liver function may change during treatment with Harvoni, a close monitoring of International Normalised Ratio (INR) values is recommended.

Interactions between Harvoni and other medicinal products

Table 4 provides a listing of established or potentially clinically significant medicinal product interactions (where 90% confidence interval [CI] of the geometric least-squares mean [GLSM] ratio were within “↔”, extended above “↑”, or extended below “↓” the predetermined equivalence boundaries). The medicinal product interactions described are based on studies conducted with either ledipasvir/sofosbuvir or ledipasvir and sofosbuvir as individual agents, or are predicted medicinal product interactions that may occur with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. The table is not all-inclusive.

Table 4: Interactions between Harvoni and other medicinal products

Medicinal product by

 

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

 

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

ACID REDUCING AGENTS

 

 

 

 

 

Ledipasvir solubility decreases as pH increases.

 

 

 

Medicinal products that increase gastric pH are

 

 

 

expected to decrease concentration of ledipasvir.

Antacids

 

 

e.g. Aluminium or

 

Interaction not studied.

It is recommended to separate antacid and Harvoni

magnesium hydroxide;

 

Expected:

administration by 4 hours.

calcium carbonate

 

↓ Ledipasvir

 

 

 

↔ Sofosbuvir

 

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

 

(Increase in gastric pH)

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

H2-receptor antagonists

 

 

Famotidine

Ledipasvir

H2-receptor antagonists may be administered

(40 mg single dose)/

↓ Cmax 0.80 (0.69, 0.93)

simultaneously with or staggered from Harvoni at a

ledipasvir (90 mg single

↔ AUC 0.89 (0.76, 1.06)

dose that does not exceed doses comparable to

dose)c/ sofosbuvir (400 mg

 

famotidine 40 mg twice daily.

single dose)c, d

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.15 (0.88, 1.50)

 

Famotidine dosed

↔ AUC 1.11 (1.00, 1.24)

 

simultaneously with

GS-331007

 

Harvonid

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.06 (0.97, 1.14)

 

Cimetidinee

↔ AUC 1.06 (1.02, 1.11)

 

 

 

Nizatidinee

(Increase in gastric pH)

 

Ranitidinee

 

 

Famotidine

Ledipasvir

 

(40 mg single dose)/

↓ Cmax 0.83 (0.69, 1.00)

 

ledipasvir (90 mg single

↔ AUC 0.98 (0.80, 1.20)

 

dose)c/ sofosbuvir (400 mg

 

 

single dose)c, d

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.00 (0.76, 1.32)

 

Famotidine dosed 12 hours

↔ AUC 0.95 (0.82, 1.10)

 

prior to Harvonid

GS-331007

 

 

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.13 (1.07, 1.20)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.06 (1.01, 1.12)

 

 

(Increase in gastric pH)

 

Proton pump inhibitors

 

 

Omeprazole

Ledipasvir

Proton pump inhibitor doses comparable to

(20 mg once daily)/

↓ Cmax 0.89 (0.61, 1.30)

omeprazole 20 mg can be administered

ledipasvir (90 mg single

↓ AUC 0.96 (0.66, 1.39)

simultaneously with Harvoni. Proton pump

dose)c/ sofosbuvir (400 mg

 

inhibitors should not be taken before Harvoni.

single dose)c

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.12 (0.88, 1.42)

 

Omeprazole dosed

↔ AUC 1.00 (0.80, 1.25)

 

simultaneously with

GS-331007

 

Harvoni

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.14 (1.01, 1.29)

 

Lansoprazolee

↔ AUC 1.03 (0.96, 1.12)

 

Rabeprazolee

 

 

Pantoprazolee

(Increase in gastric pH)

 

Esomeprazolee

 

 

ANTIARRHYTHMICS

 

 

Amiodarone

Interaction not studied.

Use only if no other alternative is available. Close

 

 

monitoring is recommended if this medicinal

 

 

product is administered with Harvoni (see

 

 

sections 4.4 and 4.8).

Digoxin

Interaction not studied.

Co-administration of Harvoni with digoxin may

 

Expected:

increase the concentration of digoxin. Caution is

 

↑ Digoxin

warranted and therapeutic concentration monitoring

 

↔ Ledipasvir

of digoxin is recommended when co-administered

 

↔ Sofosbuvir

with Harvoni.

 

GS-331007

 

 

(Inhibition of P-gp)

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

ANTICOAGULANTS

 

 

Dabigatran etexilate

Interaction not studied.

Clinical monitoring, looking for signs of bleeding

 

Expected:

and anaemia, is recommended when dabigatran

 

↑ Dabigatran

etexilate is co-administered with Harvoni. A

 

↔ Ledipasvir

coagulation test helps to identify patients with an

 

↔ Sofosbuvir

increased bleeding risk due to increased dabigatran

 

GS-331007

exposure.

 

(Inhibition of P-gp)

 

Vitamin K antagonists

Interaction not studied

Close monitoring of INR is recommended with all

 

 

vitamin K antagonists. This is due to liver function

 

 

changes during treatment with Harvoni.

ANTICONVULSANTS

 

 

Carbamazepine

Interaction not studied.

Harvoni is contraindicated with carbamazepine,

Phenobarbital

Expected:

phenobarbital and phenytoin, potent intestinal

Phenytoin

↓ Ledipasvir

P-gp inducers (see section 4.3).

 

↓ Sofosbuvir

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

(Induction of P-gp)

 

Oxcarbazepine

Interaction not studied.

Co-administration of Harvoni with oxcarbazepine is

 

Expected:

expected to decrease the concentration of ledipasvir

 

↓ Ledipasvir

and sofosbuvir leading to reduced therapeutic effect

 

↓ Sofosbuvir

of Harvoni. Such co-administration is not

 

GS-331007

recommended (see section 4.4).

 

(Induction of P-gp)

 

ANTIMYCOBACTERIALS

 

 

Rifampicin (600 mg once

Interaction not studied.

Harvoni is contraindicated with rifampicin, a potent

daily)/ ledipasvir (90 mg

Expected:

intestinal P-gp inducer (see section 4.3).

single dose)d

Rifampicin

 

 

↔ Cmax

 

 

↔ AUC

 

 

↔ Cmin

 

Observed:

Ledipasvir

Cmax 0.65 (0.56, 0.76)

AUC 0.41 (0.36, 0.48)

(Induction of P-gp)

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

Rifampicin (600 mg once

Interaction not studied.

 

daily)/ sofosbuvir (400 mg

Expected:

 

single dose)d

Rifampicin

 

 

↔ Cmax

 

 

↔ AUC

 

 

↔ Cmin

 

 

Observed:

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↓ Cmax 0.23 (0.19, 0.29)

 

 

↓ AUC 0.28 (0.24, 0.32)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.23 (1.14, 1.34)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.95 (0.88, 1.03)

 

 

(Induction of P-gp)

 

Rifabutin

Interaction not studied.

Harvoni is contraindicated with rifabutin, a potent

Rifapentine

Expected:

intestinal P-gp inducer (see section 4.3).

 

↓ Ledipasvir

 

 

↓ Sofosbuvir

Co-administration of Harvoni with rifapentine is

 

GS-331007

expected to decrease the concentration of ledipasvir

 

 

and sofosbuvir, leading to reduced therapeutic effect

 

(Induction of P-gp)

of Harvoni. Such co-administration is not

 

 

recommended.

HCV PRODUCTS

 

 

Simeprevir (150 mg once

Simeprevir

Concentrations of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir and

daily)/ ledipasvir (30 mg

↑ Cmax 2.61 (2.39, 2.86)

simeprevir are increased when simeprevir is

once daily)

↑ AUC 2.69 (2.44, 2.96)

co-administered with Harvoni. Co-administration is

 

Ledipasvir

not recommended.

 

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.81 (1.69, 2.94)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.92 (1.77, 2.07)

 

Simeprevirh

Simeprevir

 

 

↔ Cmax 0.96 (0.71, 1.30)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.94 (0.67, 1.33)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.91 (1.26, 2.90)

 

 

↑ AUC 3.16 (2.25, 4.44)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↓ Cmax 0.69 (0.52, 0.93)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.09 (0.87, 1.37)

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

HIV ANTIVIRAL AGENTS: REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE INHIBITORS

Efavirenz/ emtricitabine/

Efavirenz

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or efavirenz/

tenofovir disoproxil

↔ Cmax 0.87 (0.79, 0.97)

emtricitabine/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is

fumarate

↔ AUC 0.90 (0.84, 0.96)

required.

(600 mg/ 200 mg/ 300 mg/

↔ Cmin 0.91 (0.83, 0.99)

 

once daily)/ ledipasvir

 

 

(90 mg once daily)c/

Emtricitabine

 

sofosbuvir (400 mg once

↔ Cmax 1.08 (0.97, 1.21)

 

daily)c, d

↔ AUC 1.05 (0.98, 1.11)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.04 (0.98, 1.11)

 

 

Tenofovir

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.79 (1.56, 2.04)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.98 (1.77, 2.23)

 

 

↑ Cmin 2.63 (2.32, 2.97)

 

 

Ledipasvir

 

 

↓ Cmax 0.66 (0.59, 0.75)

 

 

↓ AUC 0.66 (0.59, 0.75)

 

 

↓ Cmin 0.66 (0.57, 0.76)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.03 (0.87, 1.23)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.94 (0.81, 1.10)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 0.86 (0.76, 0.96)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.90 (0.83, 0.97)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.07 (1.02, 1.13)

 

Emtricitabine/ rilpivirine/

Emtricitabine

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or emtricitabine/

tenofovir disoproxil

↔ Cmax 1.02 (0.98, 1.06)

rilpivirine/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate is

fumarate

↔ AUC 1.05 (1.02, 1.08)

required.

(200 mg/ 25 mg/ 300 mg

↔ Cmin 1.06 (0.97, 1.15)

 

once daily)/ ledipasvir

 

 

(90 mg once daily)c/

Rilpivirine

 

sofosbuvir (400 mg once

↔ Cmax 0.97 (0.88, 1.07)

 

daily)c, d

↔ AUC 1.02 (0.94, 1.11)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.12 (1.03, 1.21)

 

 

Tenofovir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.32 (1.25, 1.39)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.40 (1.31, 1.50)

 

 

↑ Cmin 1.91 (1.74, 2.10)

 

 

Ledipasvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.01 (0.95, 1.07)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.08 (1.02, 1.15)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.16 (1.08, 1.25)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.05 (0.93, 1.20)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.10 (1.01, 1.21)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.06 (1.01, 1.11)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.15 (1.11, 1.19)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.18 (1.13, 1.24)

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

Abacavir/ lamivudine

Abacavir

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or abacavir/

(600 mg/ 300 mg once

↔ Cmax 0.92 (0.87, 0.97)

lamivudine is required.

daily)/ ledipasvir (90 mg

↔ AUC 0.90 (0.85, 0.94)

 

once daily)c/ sofosbuvir

 

 

(400 mg once daily)c, d

Lamivudine

 

 

↔ Cmax 0.93 (0.87, 1.00)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.94 (0.90, 0.98)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.12 (1.05, 1.20)

 

 

Ledipasvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.10 (1.01, 1.19)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.18 (1.10, 1.28)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.26 (1.17, 1.36)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.08 (0.85, 1.35)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.21 (1.09, 1.35)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.00 (0.94, 1.07)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.05 (1.01, 1.09)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.08 (1.01, 1.14)

 

HIV ANTIVIRAL AGENTS: HIV PROTEASE INHIBITORS

Atazanavir boosted with

Atazanavir

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or atazanavir

ritonavir

↔ Cmax 1.07 (1.00, 1.15)

(ritonavir boosted) is required.

(300 mg/ 100 mg once

↔ AUC 1.33 (1.25, 1.42)

 

daily)/ ledipasvir (90 mg

↑ Cmin 1.75 (1.58, 1.93)

For the combination of tenofovir/emtricitabine +

once daily)c/ sofosbuvir

 

atazanavir/ritonavir, please see below.

(400 mg once daily)c, d

Ledipasvir

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.98 (1.78, 2.20)

 

 

↑ AUC 2.13 (1.89, 2.40)

 

 

↑ Cmin 2.36 (2.08, 2.67)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 0.96 (0.88, 1.05)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.08 (1.02, 1.15)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.13 (1.08, 1.19)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.23 (1.18, 1.29)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.28 (1.21, 1.36)

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

Atazanavir boosted with

Atazanavir

When given with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate used

ritonavir (300 mg/ 100 mg

↔ Cmax 1.07 (0.99, 1.14)

in conjunction with atazanavir/ritonavir, Harvoni

once daily) + emtricitabine/

↔ AUC 1.27 (1.18, 1.37)

increased the concentration of tenofovir.

tenofovir disoproxil

↑ Cmin 1.63 (1.45, 1.84)

 

fumarate (200 mg/ 300 mg

Ritonavir

The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the

once daily)/ ledipasvir

setting of Harvoni and a pharmacokinetic enhancer

(90 mg once daily)c/

↔ Cmax 0.86 (0.79, 0.93)

(e.g. ritonavir or cobicistat) has not been

sofosbuvir (400 mg once

↔ AUC 0.97 (0.89, 1.05)

established.

daily)c, d

↑ Cmin 1.45 (1.27, 1.64)

The combination should be used with caution with

Dosed simultaneouslyf

Emtricitabine

frequent renal monitoring, if other alternatives are

 

↔ Cmax 0.98 (0.94, 1.02)

not available (see section 4.4).

 

↔ AUC 1.00 (0.97, 1.04)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.04 (0.96, 1.12)

Atazanavir concentrations are also increased, with a

 

Tenofovir

risk for an increase in bilirubin levels/icterus. That

 

risk is even higher if ribavirin is used as part of the

 

↑ Cmax 1.47 (1.37, 1.58)

HCV treatment.

 

↔ AUC 1.35 (1.29, 1.42)

 

 

↑ Cmin 1.47 (1.38, 1.57)

 

 

Ledipasvir

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.68 (1.54, 1.84)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.96 (1.74, 2.21)

 

 

↑ Cmin 2.18 (1.91, 2.50)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.01 (0.88, 1.15)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.11 (1.02, 1.21)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.17 (1.12, 1.23)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.31 (1.25, 1.36)

 

 

↑ Cmin 1.42 (1.34, 1.49)

 

Darunavir boosted with

Darunavir

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or darunavir

ritonavir

↔ Cmax 1.02 (0.88, 1.19)

(ritonavir boosted) is required.

(800 mg/ 100 mg once

↔ AUC 0.96 (0.84, 1.11)

 

daily)/ ledipasvir (90 mg

↔ Cmin 0.97 (0.86, 1.10)

For the combination of tenofovir/emtricitabine +

once daily)d

Ledipasvir

darunavir/ritonavir, please see below.

 

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.45 (1.34, 1.56)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.39 (1.28, 1.49)

 

 

↑ Cmin 1.39 (1.29, 1.51)

 

Darunavir boosted with

Darunavir

 

ritonavir

↔ Cmax 0.97 (0.94, 1.01)

 

(800 mg/ 100 mg once

↔ AUC 0.97 (0.94, 1.00)

 

daily)/ sofosbuvir (400 mg

↔ Cmin 0.86 (0.78, 0.96)

 

once daily)

Sofosbuvir

 

 

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.45 (1.10, 1.92)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.34 (1.12, 1.59)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 0.97 (0.90, 1.05)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.24 (1.18, 1.30)

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

Darunavir boosted with

Darunavir

When given with darunavir/ritonavir used in

ritonavir (800 mg/ 100 mg

↔ Cmax 1.01 (0.96, 1.06)

conjunction with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,

once daily) + emtricitabine/

↔ AUC 1.04 (0.99, 1.08)

Harvoni increased the concentration of tenofovir.

tenofovir disoproxil

↔ Cmin 1.08 (0.98, 1.20)

 

fumarate (200 mg/ 300 mg

Ritonavir

The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the

once daily)/ ledipasvir

setting of Harvoni and a pharmacokinetic enhancer

(90 mg once daily)c/

↔ Cmax 1.17 (1.01, 1.35)

(e.g. ritonavir or cobicistat) has not been

sofosbuvir (400 mg once

↔ AUC 1.25 (1.15, 1.36)

established.

daily)c, d

↑ Cmin 1.48 (1.34, 1.63)

The combination should be used with caution with

Dosed simultaneouslyf

Emtricitabine

frequent renal monitoring, if other alternatives are

 

↔ Cmax 1.02 (0.96, 1.08)

not available (see section 4.4).

 

↔ AUC 1.04 (1.00, 1.08)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.03 (0.97, 1.10)

 

 

Tenofovir

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.64 (1.54, 1.74)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.50 (1.42, 1.59)

 

 

↑ Cmin 1.59 (1.49, 1.70)

 

 

Ledipasvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.11 (0.99, 1.24)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.12 (1.00, 1.25)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.17 (1.04, 1.31)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↓ Cmax 0.63 (0.52, 0.75)

 

 

↓ AUC 0.73 (0.65, 0.82)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.10 (1.04, 1.16)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.20 (1.16, 1.24)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.26 (1.20, 1.32)

 

Lopinavir boosted with

Interaction not studied.

When given with lopinavir/ritonavir used in

ritonavir + emtricitabine/

Expected:

conjunction with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,

tenofovir disoproxil

↑ Lopinavir

Harvoni is expected to increase the concentration of

fumarate

↑ Ritonavir

tenofovir.

 

↔ Emtricitabine

The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the

 

↑ Tenofovir

setting of Harvoni and a pharmacokinetic enhancer

 

 

(e.g. ritonavir or cobicistat) has not been

 

↑ Ledipasvir

established.

 

↔ Sofosbuvir

 

 

GS-331007

The combination should be used with caution with

 

 

frequent renal monitoring, if other alternatives are

 

 

not available (see section 4.4).

Tipranavir boosted with

Interaction not studied.

Co-administration of Harvoni with tipranavir

ritonavir

Expected:

(ritonavir boosted) is expected to decrease the

 

↓ Ledipasvir

concentration of ledipasvir, leading to reduced

 

↓ Sofosbuvir

therapeutic effect of Harvoni. Co-administration is

 

GS-331007

not recommended.

 

(Induction of P-gp)

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

HIV ANTIVIRAL AGENTS: INTEGRASE INHIBITORS

 

Raltegravir

Raltegravir

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or raltegravir is

(400 mg twice daily)/

↓ Cmax 0.82 (0.66, 1.02)

required.

ledipasvir (90 mg once

↔ AUC 0.85 (0.70, 1.02)

 

daily)d

↑ Cmin 1.15 (0.90, 1.46)

 

 

Ledipasvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 0.92 (0.85, 1.00)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.91 (0.84, 1.00)

 

 

↔ Cmin 0.89 (0.81, 0.98)

 

Raltegravir

Raltegravir

 

(400 mg twice daily)/

↓ Cmax 0.57 (0.44, 0.75)

 

sofosbuvir (400 mg once

↓ AUC 0.73 (0.59, 0.91)

 

daily)d

↔ Cmin 0.95 (0.81, 1.12)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↔ Cmax 0.87 (0.71, 1.08)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.95 (0.82, 1.09)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.09 (0.99, 1.19)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.02 (0.97, 1.08)

 

Elvitegravir/ cobicistat/

Interaction not studied.

When given with elvitegravir/ cobicistat/

emtricitabine/ tenofovir

Expected:

emtricitabine/ tenofovir disoproxil fumarate,

disoproxil fumarate

↔ Emtricitabine

Harvoni is expected to increase the concentration of

(150 mg/ 150 mg/ 200 mg/

↑ Tenofovir

tenofovir.

300 mg once daily)/

Observed:

 

ledipasvir (90 mg once

The safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in the

daily)c/ sofosbuvir (400 mg

Elvitegravir

setting of Harvoni and a pharmacokinetic enhancer

once daily)c

↔ Cmax 0.88 (0.82, 0.95)

(e.g. ritonavir or cobicistat) has not been

 

↔ AUC 1.02 (0.95, 1.09)

established.

 

↑ Cmin 1.36 (1.23, 1.49)

The combination should be used with caution with

 

Cobicistat

 

frequent renal monitoring, if other alternatives are

 

↔ Cmax 1.25 (1.18, 1.32)

not available (see section 4.4).

 

↑ AUC 1.59 (1.49, 1.70)

 

 

↑ Cmin 4.25 (3.47, 5.22)

 

 

Ledipasvir

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.63 (1.51, 1.75)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.78 (1.64, 1.94)

 

 

↑ Cmin 1.91 (1.76, 2.08)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.33 (1.14, 1.56)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.36 (1.21, 1.52)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.33 (1.22, 1.44)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.44 (1.41, 1.48)

 

 

↑ Cmin 1.53 (1.47, 1.59)

 

Dolutegravir

Interaction not studied.

No dose adjustment required.

 

Expected:

 

 

↔ Dolutegravir

 

 

↔ Ledipasvir

 

 

↔ Sofosbuvir

 

 

GS-331007

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS

 

 

St. John’s wort

Interaction not studied.

Harvoni is contraindicated with St. John’s wort, a

 

Expected:

potent intestinal P-gp inducer (see section 4.3).

 

↓ Ledipasvir

 

 

↓ Sofosbuvir

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

(Induction of P-gp)

 

HMG-CoA REDUCTASE INHIBITORS

 

Rosuvastating

↑ Rosuvastatin

Co-administration of Harvoni with rosuvastatin may

 

 

significantly increase the concentration of

 

(Inhibition of drug

rosuvastatin (several fold-increase in AUC) which

 

transporters OATP and

is associated with increased risk of myopathy,

 

BCRP)

including rhabdomyolysis. Co-administration of

 

 

Harvoni with rosuvastatin is contraindicated (see

 

 

section 4.3).

Pravastating

↑ Pravastatin

Co-administration of Harvoni with pravastatin may

 

 

significantly increase the concentration of

 

 

pravastatin which is associated with increased risk

 

 

of myopathy. Clinical and biochemical control is

 

 

recommended in these patients and a dose

 

 

adjustment may be needed (see section 4.4).

Other statins

Expected:

Interactions cannot be excluded with other

 

↑ Statins

HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors. When

 

 

co-administered with Harvoni, a reduced dose of

 

 

statins should be considered and careful monitoring

 

 

for statin adverse reactions should be undertaken

 

 

(see section 4.4).

NARCOTIC ANALGESICS

 

 

Methadone

Interaction not studied.

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or methadone is

 

Expected:

required.

 

↔ Ledipasvir

 

Methadone

R-methadone

 

(Methadone maintenance

↔ Cmax 0.99 (0.85, 1.16)

 

therapy [30 to

↔ AUC 1.01 (0.85, 1.21)

 

130 mg/daily])/ sofosbuvir

↔ Cmin 0.94 (0.77, 1.14)

 

(400 mg once daily)d

S-methadone

 

 

 

 

↔ Cmax 0.95 (0.79, 1.13)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.95 (0.77, 1.17)

 

 

↔ Cmin 0.95 (0.74, 1.22)

 

 

Sofosbuvir

 

 

↓ Cmax 0.95 (0.68, 1.33)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.30 (1.00, 1.69)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↓ Cmax 0.73 (0.65, 0.83)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.04 (0.89, 1.22)

 

IMMUNOSUPPRESSANTS

 

 

Ciclosporing

Interaction not studied.

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or ciclosporin is

 

Expected:

required.

 

↑ Ledipasvir

 

 

↔ Ciclosporin

 

Medicinal product by

Effects on medicinal

Recommendation concerning co-administration

therapeutic areas

product levels.

with Harvoni

 

Mean ratio (90%

 

 

confidence interval) for

 

 

AUC, Cmax, Cmina, b

 

Ciclosporin

Ciclosporin

 

(600 mg single dose)/

↔ Cmax 1.06 (0.94, 1.18)

 

sofosbuvir (400 mg single

↔ AUC 0.98 (0.85, 1.14)

 

dose)h

Sofosbuvir

 

 

 

 

↑ Cmax 2.54 (1.87, 3.45)

 

 

↑ AUC 4.53 (3.26, 6.30)

 

 

GS-331007

 

 

↓ Cmax 0.60 (0.53, 0.69)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.04 (0.90, 1.20)

 

Tacrolimus

Interaction not studied.

No dose adjustment of Harvoni or tacrolimus is

 

Expected:

required.

 

↔ Ledipasvir

 

Tacrolimus

Tacrolimus

 

(5 mg single dose)/

↓ Cmax 0.73 (0.59, 0.90)

 

sofosbuvir (400 mg single

↑ AUC 1.09 (0.84, 1.40)

 

dose)h

Sofosbuvir

 

 

 

 

↓ Cmax 0.97 (0.65, 1.43)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.13 (0.81, 1.57)

 

GS-331007

Cmax 0.97 (0.83, 1.14)

AUC 1.00 (0.87, 1.13)

ORAL CONTRACEPTIVES

Norgestimate/ ethinyl

Norelgestromin

No dose adjustment of oral contraceptives is

estradiol (norgestimate

↔ Cmax 1.02 (0.89, 1.16)

required.

0.180 mg/ 0.215 mg/

↔ AUC 1.03 (0.90, 1.18)

 

0.25 mg/ ethinyl estradiol

↔ Cmin 1.09 (0.91, 1.31)

 

0.025 mg)/ ledipasvir

 

 

(90 mg once daily)d

Norgestrel

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.03 (0.87, 1.23)

 

 

↔ AUC 0.99 (0.82, 1.20)

 

 

↔ Cmin 1.00 (0.81, 1.23)

 

 

Ethinyl estradiol

 

 

↑ Cmax 1.40 (1.18, 1.66)

 

 

↔ AUC 1.20 (1.04, 1.39)

 

 

↔ Cmin 0.98 (0.79, 1.22)

 

Norgestimate/ ethinyl

Norelgestromin

 

estradiol (norgestimate

↔ Cmax 1.07 (0.94, 1.22)

 

0.180 mg/ 0.215 mg/

↔ AUC 1.06 (0.92, 1.21)

 

0.25 mg/ ethinyl estradiol

↔ Cmin 1.07 (0.89, 1.28)

 

0.025 mg)/ sofosbuvir

 

 

(400 mg once daily)d

Norgestrel

 

 

↔ Cmax 1.18 (0.99, 1.41)

 

 

↑ AUC 1.19 (0.98, 1.45)

 

 

↑ Cmin 1.23 (1.00, 1.51)

 

Ethinyl estradiol

Cmax 1.15 (0.97, 1.36)

AUC 1.09 (0.94, 1.26)

Cmin 0.99 (0.80, 1.23)

a.Mean ratio (90% CI) of co-administered drug pharmacokinetics of study medicinal products alone or in combination. No effect = 1.00.

b.All interaction studies conducted in healthy volunteers.

c.Administered as Harvoni.

d.Lack of pharmacokinetics interaction bounds 70-143%.

e.These are drugs within class where similar interactions could be predicted.

f.Staggered administration (12 hours apart) of atazanavir/ritonavir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate or darunavir/ritonavir + emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and Harvoni provided similar results.

g.This study was conducted in the presence of another two direct-acting antiviral agents.

h.Bioequivalence/Equivalence boundary 80-125%.

4.6Fertility, pregnancy and lactation

Women of childbearing potential / contraception in males and females

When Harvoni is used in combination with ribavirin, extreme care must be taken to avoid pregnancy in female patients and in female partners of male patients. Significant teratogenic and/or embryocidal effects have been demonstrated in all animal species exposed to ribavirin. Women of childbearing potential or their male partners must use an effective form of contraception during treatment and for a period of time after the treatment has concluded as recommended in the Summary of Product Characteristics for ribavirin. Refer to the Summary of Product Characteristics for ribavirin for additional information.

Pregnancy

There are no or limited amount of data (less than 300 pregnancy outcomes) from the use of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir or Harvoni in pregnant women.

Animal studies do not indicate direct harmful effects with respect to reproductive toxicity. No significant effects on foetal development have been observed with ledipasvir or sofosbuvir in rats and rabbits. However, it has not been possible to fully estimate exposure margins achieved for sofosbuvir in the rat relative to the exposure in humans at the recommended clinical dose (see section 5.3).

As a precautionary measure, it is preferable to avoid the use of Harvoni during pregnancy.

Breast-feeding

It is unknown whether ledipasvir or sofosbuvir and its metabolites are excreted in human milk.

Available pharmacokinetic data in animals has shown excretion of ledipasvir and metabolites of sofosbuvir in milk (see section 5.3).

A risk to the newborns/infants cannot be excluded. Therefore, Harvoni should not be used during breast-feeding.

Fertility

No human data on the effect of Harvoni on fertility are available. Animal studies do not indicate harmful effects of ledipasvir or sofosbuvir on fertility.

If ribavirin is co-administered with Harvoni, the contraindications regarding use of ribavirin during pregnancy and breast-feeding apply (see also the Summary of Product Characteristics for ribavirin).

4.7Effects on ability to drive and use machines

Harvoni (administered alone or in combination with ribavirin) has no or negligible influence on the ability to drive and use machines. However, patients should be advised that fatigue was more common in patients treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir compared to placebo.

4.8Undesirable effects

Summary of the safety profile

The safety assessment of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir is based on pooled data from three Phase 3 clinical studies (ION-3, ION-1 and ION-2) including 215, 539 and 326 patients who received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 8, 12 and 24 weeks, respectively; and 216, 328 and 328 patients who received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin combination therapy for 8, 12 and 24 weeks, respectively.

These studies did not include any control group not receiving ledipasvir/sofosbuvir. Further data include a double-blind comparison of the safety of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (12 weeks) and placebo in 155 cirrhotic patients (see section 5.1).

The proportion of patients who permanently discontinued treatment due to adverse events was 0%,

<1% and 1% for patients receiving ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 8, 12 and 24 weeks, respectively; and

<1%, 0%, and 2% for patients receiving ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin combination therapy for 8, 12 and 24 weeks, respectively.

In clinical studies, fatigue and headache were more common in patients treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir compared to placebo. When ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was studied with ribavirin, the most frequent adverse drug reactions to ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin combination therapy were consistent with the known safety profile of ribavirin, without increasing the frequency or severity of the expected adverse drug reactions.

The following adverse drug reactions have been identified with Harvoni (Table 5). The adverse reactions are listed below by body system organ class and frequency. Frequencies are defined as follows: very common (≥ 1/10), common (≥ 1/100 to < 1/10), uncommon (≥ 1/1,000 to < 1/100), rare

(≥ 1/10,000 to < 1/1,000) or very rare (< 1/10,000).

Table 5: Adverse drug reactions identified with Harvoni

Frequency

Adverse drug reaction

Nervous system disorders:

 

Very common

headache

Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders:

Common

rash

Unknown frequency

angioedema

General disorders:

 

Very common

fatigue

Patients with decompensated cirrhosis and/or who are awaiting liver transplant or post-liver transplant The safety profile of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks in patients with decompensated liver disease and/or those post-liver transplant was assessed in two open-label studies (SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2). No new adverse drug reactions were detected among patients with decompensated cirrhosis and/or who were post-liver transplant and who received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin. Although adverse events, including serious adverse events, occurred more frequently in this study compared to studies that excluded decompensated patients and/or patients who were post- liver transplantation, the adverse events observed were those expected as clinical sequelae of advanced liver disease and/or transplantation or were consistent with the known safety profile of ribavirin (see section 5.1 for details of this study).

Decreases in haemoglobin to < 10 g/dL and < 8.5 g/dL during treatment were experienced by 39% and 13% of patients treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin, respectively. Ribavirin was discontinued in 15% of the patients.

7% of liver transplant recipients had a modification of their immunosuppressive agents.

Paediatric population

The safety and efficacy of Harvoni in children and adolescents aged less than 18 years have not yet been established. No data are available.

Description of selected adverse reactions

Cardiac arrhythmias

Cases of severe bradycardia and heart block have been observed when Harvoni is used with concomitant amiodarone and/or other drugs that lower heart rate (see sections 4.4 and 4.5).

Reporting of suspected adverse reactions

Reporting suspected adverse reactions after authorisation of the medicinal product is important. It allows continued monitoring of the benefit/risk balance of the medicinal product. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions via the national reporting system listed in Appendix V.

4.9Overdose

The highest documented doses of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir were 120 mg twice daily for 10 days and a single dose of 1,200 mg, respectively. In these healthy volunteer studies, there were no untoward effects observed at these dose levels, and adverse reactions were similar in frequency and severity to those reported in the placebo groups. The effects of higher doses are not known.

No specific antidote is available for overdose with Harvoni. If overdose occurs the patient must be monitored for evidence of toxicity. Treatment of overdose with Harvoni consists of general supportive measures including monitoring of vital signs as well as observation of the clinical status of the patient. Haemodialysis is unlikely to result in significant removal of ledipasvir as ledipasvir is highly bound to plasma protein. Haemodialysis can efficiently remove the predominant circulating metabolite of sofosbuvir, GS-331007, with an extraction ratio of 53%.

5.PHARMACOLOGICAL PROPERTIES

5.1Pharmacodynamic properties

Pharmacotherapeutic group: Direct-acting antiviral, ATC code: J05AX65

Mechanism of action

Ledipasvir is a HCV inhibitor targeting the HCV NS5A protein, which is essential for both RNA replication and the assembly of HCV virions. Biochemical confirmation of NS5A inhibition by ledipasvir is not currently possible as NS5A has no enzymatic function. In vitro resistance selection and cross-resistance studies indicate ledipasvir targets NS5A as its mode of action.

Sofosbuvir is a pan-genotypic inhibitor of the HCV NS5B RNA-dependent RNA polymerase, which is essential for viral replication. Sofosbuvir is a nucleotide prodrug that undergoes intracellular metabolism to form the pharmacologically active uridine analogue triphosphate (GS-461203), which can be incorporated into HCV RNA by the NS5B polymerase and acts as a chain terminator. GS-461203 (the active metabolite of sofosbuvir) is neither an inhibitor of human DNA and

RNA polymerases nor an inhibitor of mitochondrial RNA polymerase.

Antiviral activity

The EC50 values of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir against full-length or chimeric replicons encoding NS5A and NS5B sequences from clinical isolates are detailed in Table 6. The presence of 40% human serum had no effect on the anti-HCV activity of sofosbuvir but reduced the anti-HCV activity of ledipasvir by 12-fold against genotype 1a HCV replicons.

Table 6: Activity of ledipasvir and sofosbuvir against chimeric replicons

Genotype

Ledipasvir activity (EC50, nM)

Sofosbuvir activity (EC50, nM)

replicons

 

 

 

 

Stable replicons

NS5A transient

Stable replicons

NS5B transient

 

 

replicons

 

replicons

 

 

Median (range)a

 

Median (range)a

Genotype 1a

0.031

0.018 (0.009-0.085)

62 (29-128)

Genotype 1b

0.004

0.006 (0.004-0.007)

102 (45-170)

Genotype 2a

21-249

-

29 (14-81)

Genotype 2b

16-530b

-

15b

-

Genotype 3a

-

81 (24-181)

Genotype 4a

0.39

-

-

Genotype 4d

0.60

-

-

-

Genotype 5a

0.15b

-

15b

-

Genotype 6a

1.1b

-

14b

-

Genotype 6e

264b

-

-

-

a.Transient replicons carrying NS5A or NS5B from patient isolates.

b.The chimeric replicons carrying NS5A genes from genotype 2b, 5a, 6a and 6e were used for testing ledipasvir while the chimeric replicons carrying NS5B genes from genotype 2b, 5a or 6a were used for testing sofosbuvir.

Resistance

In cell culture

HCV replicons with reduced susceptibility to ledipasvir have been selected in cell culture for genotype 1a and 1b. Reduced susceptibility to ledipasvir was associated with the primary NS5A substitution Y93H in both genotype 1a and 1b. Additionally a Q30E substitution developed in genotype 1a replicons. Site-directed mutagenesis of NS5A RAVs showed that substitutions conferring a fold-change > 100 and ≤ 1,000 in ledipasvir susceptibility are Q30H/R, L31I/M/V, P32L and Y93T in genotype 1a and P58D and Y93S in genotype 1b; and substitutions conferring a fold-change

> 1,000 are M28A/G, Q30E/G/K, H58D, Y93C/H/N/S in genotype 1a and A92K and Y93H in genotype 1b.

HCV replicons with reduced susceptibility to sofosbuvir have been selected in cell culture for multiple genotypes including 1b, 2a, 2b, 3a, 4a, 5a and 6a. Reduced susceptibility to sofosbuvir was associated with the primary NS5B substitution S282T in all replicon genotypes examined. Site-directed mutagenesis of the S282T substitution in replicons of 8 genotypes conferred 2- to 18-fold reduced susceptibility to sofosbuvir and reduced the viral replication capacity by 89% to 99% compared to the corresponding wild-type.

In clinical studies – Genotype 1

In a pooled analysis of patients who received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in Phase 3 studies (ION-3, ION-1 and ION-2), 37 patients (29 with genotype 1a and 8 with genotype 1b) qualified for resistance analysis due to virologic failure or early study drug discontinuation and having HCV RNA > 1,000 IU/mL. Post-baseline NS5A and NS5B deep sequencing data (assay cut off of 1%) were available for 37/37 and 36/37 patients, respectively.

NS5A resistance-associated variants (RAVs) were observed in post-baseline isolates from

29/37 patients (22/29 genotype 1a and 7/8 genotype 1b) not achieving sustained virologic response (SVR). Of the 29 genotype 1a patients who qualified for resistance testing, 22/29 (76%) patients harboured one or more NS5A RAVs at positions K24, M28, Q30, L31, S38 and Y93 at failure, while the remaining 7/29 patients had no NS5A RAVs detected at failure. The most common variants were Q30R, Y93H and L31M. Of the 8 genotype 1b patients who qualified for resistance testing, 7/8 (88%) harboured one or more NS5A RAVs at positions L31 and Y93 at failure, while 1/8 patients had no NS5A RAVs at failure. The most common variant was Y93H. Among the 8 patients who had no NS5A RAVs at failure, 7 patients received 8 weeks of treatment (n = 3 with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir;

n = 4 with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin) and 1 patient received ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks. In phenotypic analyses, post-baseline isolates from patients who harboured NS5A RAVs at failure showed 20- to at least a 243-fold (the highest dose tested) reduced susceptibility to ledipasvir. Site-directed mutagenesis of the Y93H substitution in both genotype 1a and 1b as well as the Q30R

and L31M substitution in genotype 1a conferred high levels of reduced susceptibility to ledipasvir (fold-change in EC50 ranging from 544-fold to 1,677-fold).

Among post-transplant subjects with compensated liver disease or subjects with decompensated liver disease either pre- or post-transplant (SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2 studies), relapse was associated with the detection of one or more of the following NS5A RAVs: K24R, M28T, Q30R/H/K, L31V, H58D and Y93H/C in 12/14 genotype 1a subjects, and L31M, Y93H/N in 6/6 genotype 1b subjects.

A NS5B substitution E237G was detected in 3 subjects (1 genotype 1b and 2 genotype 1a) in the Phase 3 studies (ION-3, ION-1 and ION-2) and 3 subjects with genotype 1a infection in the SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2 studies at the time of relapse. The E237G substitution showed a 1.3-fold reduction in susceptibility to sofosbuvir in the genotype 1a replicon assay. The clinical significance of this substitution is currently unknown.

The sofosbuvir resistance-associated substitution S282T in NS5B was not detected in any virologic failure isolate from the Phase 3 studies. However, the NS5B S282T substitution in combination with NS5A substitutions L31M, Y93H and Q30L were detected in one patient at failure following 8 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir from a Phase 2 study (LONESTAR). This patient was subsequently retreated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin for 24 weeks and achieved SVR following retreatment.

In the SIRIUS study (see “Clinical efficacy and safety”, below) 5 patients with genotype 1 infection relapsed after treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin. NS5A RAVs were seen at relapse in 5/5 patients (for genotype 1a: Q30R/H + L31M/V [n = 1] and Q30R [n = 1]; for genotype 1b: Y93H [n = 3]).

In clinical studies – Genotype 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

NS5A RAVs: No genotype 2 infected patients experienced relapse in the clinical study and therefore there are no data regarding NS5A RAVs at the time of failure.

In genotype 3 infected patients experiencing virologic failure, development of NS5A RAVs (including enrichment of RAVs present at baseline) was typically not detected at the time of failure (n = 17).

In genotype 4, 5 and 6 infection, only small numbers of patients have been evaluated (total of

5 patients with failure). The NS5A substitution Y93C emerged in the HCV of 1 patient (genotype 4), while NS5A RAVs present at baseline were observed at the time of failure in all patients. In the SOLAR-2 study, one subject with genotype 4d developed NS5B substitution E237G at the time of relapse. The clinical significance of this substitution is currently unknown.

NS5B RAVs: The NS5B substitution S282T emerged in the HCV of 1/17 genotype 3-failures, and in the HCV of 1/3, 1/1 and 1/1 of genotype 4-, 5- and 6-failures, respectively.

Effect of baseline HCV resistance-associated variants on treatment outcome

Genotype 1

Analyses were conducted to explore the association between pre-existing baseline NS5A RAVs and treatment outcome. In the pooled analysis of the Phase 3 studies, 16% of patients had baseline NS5A RAVs identified by population or deep sequencing irrespective of subtype. Baseline

NS5A RAVs were overrepresented in patients who experienced relapse in the Phase 3 studies (see “Clinical efficacy and safety”).

Following 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (without ribavirin) in treatment- experienced patients (arm 1 of ION-2 study) 4/4 patients with baseline NS5A RAVs conferring a ledipasvir fold-change of ≤ 100 achieved SVR. For the same treatment arm, patients with baseline NS5A RAVs conferring a fold-change of > 100, relapse occurred in 4/13 (31%), as compared to 3/95 (3%) in those without any baseline RAVs or RAVs conferring a fold-change of ≤ 100.

Following 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin in treatment-experienced patients with compensated cirrhosis (SIRIUS, n = 77), 8/8 patients with baseline NS5A RAVs conferring > 100-fold reduced susceptibility to ledipasvir achieved SVR12.

Among post-transplant subjects with compensated liver disease (SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2 studies), no relapse occurred in subjects with baseline NS5A RAVs (n = 23) following 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin. Among subjects with decompensated liver disease (pre- and post- transplant), 4/16 (25%) subjects with NS5A RAVs conferring > 100-fold resistance relapsed after 12 weeks treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin compared to 7/120 (6%) in those without any baseline NS5A RAVs or RAVs conferring a fold-change of ≤ 100.

The group of NS5A RAVs that conferred > 100-fold shift and was observed in patients were the following substitutions in genotype 1a (M28A, Q30H/R/E, L31M/V/I, H58D, Y93H/N/C) or in genotype 1b (Y93H). The proportion of such baseline NS5A RAVs seen with deep sequencing varied from very low (cut off for assay = 1%) to high (main part of the plasma population).

The sofosbuvir resistance-associated substitution S282T was not detected in the baseline NS5B sequence of any patient in Phase 3 studies by population or deep sequencing. SVR was achieved in all 24 patients (n = 20 with L159F+C316N; n = 1 with L159F; and n = 3 with N142T) who had baseline variants associated with resistance to NS5B nucleoside inhibitors.

Genotype 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6

Due to the limited size of studies, the impact of baseline NS5A RAVs on treatment outcome for patients with genotype 2, 3, 4, 5 or 6 CHC has not been fully evaluated. No major differences in outcomes were observed by the presence or absence of baseline NS5A RAVs.

Cross-resistance

Ledipasvir was fully active against the sofosbuvir resistance-associated substitution S282T in NS5B while all ledipasvir resistance-associated substitutions in NS5A were fully susceptible to sofosbuvir. Both sofosbuvir and ledipasvir were fully active against substitutions associated with resistance to other classes of direct-acting antivirals with different mechanisms of actions, such as NS5B non-nucleoside inhibitors and NS3 protease inhibitors. NS5A substitutions conferring resistance to ledipasvir may reduce the antiviral activity of other NS5A inhibitors.

Clinical efficacy and safety

The efficacy of Harvoni (ledipasvir [LDV]/sofosbuvir [SOF]) was evaluated in three open-label Phase 3 studies with data available for a total of 1,950 patients with genotype 1 CHC. The three Phase 3 studies included one study conducted in non-cirrhotic treatment-naïve patients (ION-3); one study in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic treatment-naïve patients (ION-1); and one study in cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic patients who failed prior therapy with an interferon-based regimen, including regimens containing an HCV protease inhibitor (ION-2). Patients in these studies had compensated liver disease. All three Phase 3 studies evaluated the efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin.

Treatment duration was fixed in each study. Serum HCV RNA values were measured during the clinical studies using the COBAS TaqMan HCV test (version 2.0), for use with the High Pure System. The assay had a lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) of 25 IU/mL. SVR was the primary endpoint to determine the HCV cure rate which was defined as HCV RNA less than LLOQ at 12 weeks after the cessation of treatment.

Treatment-naïve adults without cirrhosis – ION-3 (study 0108) – Genotype 1

ION-3 evaluated 8 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin and 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in treatment-naïve non-cirrhotic patients with

genotype 1 CHC. Patients were randomised in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the three treatment groups and stratified by HCV genotype (1a versus 1b).

Table 7: Demographics and baseline characteristics in study ION-3

Patient disposition

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

LDV/SOF

TOTAL

 

8 weeks

8 weeks

12 weeks

 

 

 

(n = 215)

(n = 216)

(n = 216)

(n = 647)

Age (years): median (range)

53 (22-75)

51 (21-71)

53 (20-71)

52 (20-75)

Male gender

60%

(130)

54%

(117)

59%

(128)

58%

(375)

Race: Black/ African American

21%

(45)

17%

(36)

19%

(42)

19%

(123)

White

76%

(164)

81%

(176)

77%

(167)

78%

(507)

Genotype 1a

80%

(171)

80%

(172)

80%

(172)

80%

(515)a

IL28CC genotype

26%

(56)

28%

(60)

26%

(56)

27%

(172)

FibroTest-Determined Metavir scoreb

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F0-F1

33%

(72)

38%

(81)

33%

(72)

35%

(225)

F2

30%

(65)

28%

(61)

30%

(65)

30%

(191)

F3-F4

36%

(77)

33%

(71)

37%

(79)

35%

(227)

Not interpretable

< 1% (1)

1% (3)

0% (0)

< 1% (4)

a.One patient in the LDV/SOF 8-week treatment arm did not have a confirmed genotype 1 subtype.

b.Non-missing FibroTest results are mapped to Metavir scores according to: 0-0.31 = F0-F1; 0.32-0.58 = F2; 0.59-1.00 = F3-F4.

Table 8: Response rates in study ION-3

 

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

LDV/SOF

 

8 weeks

8 weeks

12 weeks

 

(n = 215)

(n = 216)

(n = 216)

SVR

94%

(202/215)

93%

(201/216)

96%

(208/216)

Outcome for patients without SVR

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-treatment virologic failure

0/215

0/216

0/216

Relapsea

5% (11/215)

4% (9/214)

1% (3/216)

Otherb

< 1% (2/215)

3% (6/216)

2% (5/216)

Genotype

 

 

 

 

 

 

Genotype 1a

93%

(159/171)

92%

(159/172)

96%

(165/172)

Genotype 1b

98%

(42/43)

95%

(42/44)

98%

(43/44)

a.The denominator for relapse is the number of patients with HCV RNA < LLOQ at their last on-treatment assessment.

b.Other includes patients who did not achieve SVR and did not meet virologic failure criteria (e.g. lost to follow-up).

The 8-week treatment of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin was non-inferior to the 8-week treatment of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin (treatment difference 0.9%; 95% confidence interval: -3.9% to 5.7%) and the 12-week treatment of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (treatment difference -2.3%; 97.5% confidence interval: -7.2% to 3.6%). Among patients with a baseline HCV RNA < 6 million IU/mL, the SVR was 97% (119/123) with 8-week treatment of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and 96% (126/131) with 12-week treatment of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.

Table 9: Relapse rates by baseline characteristics in the ION-3 study, virological failure population*

 

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

LDV/SOF

 

8 weeks

8 weeks

12 weeks

 

(n = 213)

(n = 210)

(n = 211)

Gender

 

 

 

 

 

 

Male

8%

(10/129)

7%

(8/114)

2%

(3/127)

Female

1%

(1/84)

1%

(1/96)

0%

(0/84)

IL28 genotype

 

 

 

 

 

 

CC

4%

(2/56)

0%

(0/57)

0%

(0/54)

Non-CC

6%

(9/157)

6%

(9/153)

2%

(3/157)

Baseline HCV RNAa

 

 

 

 

 

 

HCV RNA < 6 million IU/mL

2%

(2/121)

2%

(3/136)

2%

(2/128)

HCV RNA ≥ 6 million IU/mL

10% (9/92)

8%

(6/74)

1%

(1/83)

* Patients lost to follow-up or who withdrew consent excluded.

a. HCV RNA values were determined using the Roche TaqMan Assay; a patient’s HCV RNA may vary from visit to visit.

Treatment-naïve adults with or without cirrhosis – ION-1 (study 0102) – Genotype 1

ION-1 was a randomised, open-label study that evaluated 12 and 24 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin in 865 treatment-naïve patients with genotype 1 CHC

including those with cirrhosis (randomised 1:1:1:1). Randomisation was stratified by the presence or absence of cirrhosis and HCV genotype (1a versus 1b).

Table 10: Demographics and baseline characteristics in study ION-1

Patient disposition

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+

TOTAL

 

12 weeks

RBV

24 weeks

RBV

 

 

(n = 214)

12 weeks

(n = 217)

24 weeks

(n = 865)

 

 

 

(n = 217)

 

 

(n = 217)

 

Age (years): median (range)

52 (18-75)

52 (18-78)

53 (22-80)

53 (24-77)

52 (18-80)

Male gender

59%

(127)

59%

(128)

64%

(139)

55%

(119)

59% (513)

Race: Black/ African

11%

(24)

12%

(26)

15%

(32)

12%

(26)

12% (108)

American

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

White

87%

(187)

87%

(188)

82%

(177)

84%

(183)

85% (735)

Genotype 1aa

68%

(145)

68%

(148)

67%

(146)

66%

(143)

67% (582)

IL28CC genotype

26%

(55)

35%

(76)

24%

(52)

34%

(73)

30% (256)

FibroTest-Determined Metavir scoreb

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

F0-F1

27%

(57)

26%

(56)

29%

(62)

30%

(66)

28% (241)

F2

26%

(56)

25%

(55)

22%

(47)

28%

(60)

25% (218)

F3-F4

47%

(100)

48%

(104)

49%

(107)

42%

(91)

46% (402)

Not interpretable

< 1% (1)

1% (2)

< 1% (1)

0% (0)

< 1% (4)

a.Two patients in the LDV/SOF 12-week treatment arm, one patient in the LDV/SOF+RBV 12-week treatment arm, two patients in the LDV/SOF 24-week treatment arm, and two patients in the LDV/SOF+RBV 24-week treatment arm did not have a confirmed genotype 1 subtype.

b.Non-missing FibroTest results are mapped to Metavir scores according to: 0-0.31 = F0-F1; 0.32-0.58 = F2;

0.59-1.00 = F3-F4.

Table 11: Response rates in study ION-1

 

 

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

 

 

12 weeks

12 weeks

24 weeks

24 weeks

 

 

(n = 214)

(n = 217)

(n = 217)

(n = 217)

SVR

 

99%

(210/213)

97%

(211/217)

98%

(213/217)

99% (215/217)

Outcome for patients without SVR

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-treatment virologic

 

0/213a

0/217

< 1% (1/217)

0/216

failure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Relapseb

 

< 1% (1/212)

0/217

< 1% (1/215)

0/216

Otherc

 

< 1% (2/213)

3% (6/217)

< 1% (2/217)

< 1% (2/217)

SVR rates for selected subgroups

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Genotype

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Genotype 1a

 

98%

(142/145)

97%

(143/148)

99%

(144/146)

99% (141/143)

Genotype 1b

 

100% (67/67)

99%

(67/68)

97%

(67/69)

100% (72/72)

Cirrhosisd

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No

99%

(176/177)

97%

(177/183)

98%

(181/184)

99% (178/180)

Yes

94%

(32/34)

100% (33/33)

97%

(32/33)

100% (36/36)

a.One patient was excluded from the LDV/SOF 12-week treatment arm and one patient was excluded from the LDV/SOF+RBV 24-week treatment arm as both patients were infected with genotype 4 CHC.

b.The denominator for relapse is the number of patients with HCV RNA < LLOQ at their last on-treatment assessment.

c.Other includes patients who did not achieve SVR and did not meet virologic failure criteria (e.g. lost to follow-up).

d.Patients with missing cirrhosis status were excluded from this subgroup analysis.

Previously treated adults with or without cirrhosis – ION-2 (study 0109) – Genotype 1

ION-2 was a randomised, open-label study that evaluated 12 and 24 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with or without ribavirin (randomised 1:1:1:1) in genotype 1 HCV-infected patients with or without cirrhosis who failed prior therapy with an interferon-based regimen, including regimens containing an HCV protease inhibitor. Randomisation was stratified by the presence or absence of cirrhosis, HCV genotype (1a versus 1b) and response to prior HCV therapy (relapse/breakthrough versus non-response).

Table 12: Demographics and baseline characteristics in study ION-2

Patient disposition

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+

TOTAL

 

12 weeks

RBV

24 weeks

RBV

 

 

 

(n = 109)

12 weeks

(n = 109)

24 weeks

(n = 440)

 

 

(n = 111)

 

(n = 111)

 

 

Age (years): median

56 (24-67)

57 (27-75)

56 (25-68)

55 (28-70)

56 (24-75)

(range)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Male gender

68% (74)

64% (71)

68% (74)

61% (68)

65%

(287)

Race: Black/ African

22% (24)

14% (16)

16% (17)

18% (20)

18%

(77)

American

 

 

 

 

 

 

White

77% (84)

85% (94)

83% (91)

80% (89)

81%

(358)

Genotype 1a

79% (86)

79% (88)

78% (85)

79% (88)

79%

(347)

Prior HCV therapy

 

 

 

 

 

 

PEG-IFN+RBV

39% (43)

42% (47)

53% (58)

53% (59)

47%

(207)a

HCV protease

61% (66)

58% (64)

46% (50)

46% (51)

53%

(231)a

inhibitor +

 

 

 

 

 

 

PEG-IFN+RBV

 

 

 

 

 

 

IL28CC genotype

9% (10)

10% (11)

14% (16)

16% (18)

13%

(55)

FibroTest-Determined

Metavir scoreb

 

 

 

 

 

F0-F1

14% (15)

10% (11)

12% (13)

16% (18)

13%

(57)

F2

28% (31)

26% (29)

28% (31)

30% (33)

28%

(124)

F3-F4

58% (63)

64% (71)

58% (63)

54% (60)

58%

(257)

Not interpretable

0% (0)

0% (0)

2% (2)

0% (0)

< 1% (2)

a.One patient in the LDV/SOF 24-week treatment arms and one patient in the LDV/SOF+RBV 24-week treatment arm were prior treatment failures of a non-pegylated interferon based regimen.

b.Non-missing FibroTest results are mapped to Metavir scores according to: 0-0.31 = F0-F1; 0.32-0.58 = F2;

0.59-1.00 = F3-F4.

Table 13: Response rates in study ION-2

 

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

 

12 weeks

12 weeks

24 weeks

24 weeks

 

(n = 109)

(n = 111)

(n = 109)

(n = 111)

SVR

94%

(102/109)

96%

(107/111)

99%

(108/109)

99%

(110/111)

Outcome for patients without SVR

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

On-treatment virologic

0/109

0/111

0/109

< 1% (1/111)

failure

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Relapsea

6% (7/108)

4% (4/111)

0/109

0/110

Otherb

0/109

0/111

< 1% (1/109)

0/111

SVR rates for selected subgroups

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Genotype

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Genotype 1a

95%

(82/86)

95%

(84/88)

99%

(84/85)

99%

(87/88)

Genotype 1b

87%

(20/23)

100% (23/23)

100% (24/24)

100% (23/23)

Cirrhosis

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

No

95%

(83/87)

100% (88/88)c

99%

(85/86)c

99%

(88/89)

Yesd

86%

(19/22)

82%

(18/22)

100% (22/22)

100% (22/22)

Prior HCV therapy

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

PEG-IFN+RBV

93%

(40/43)

96%

(45/47)

100% (58/58)

98%

(58/59)

HCV protease inhibitor

94%

(62/66)

97%

(62/64)

98%

(49/50)

100% (51/51)

+PEG-IFN+RBV

a.The denominator for relapse is the number of patients with HCV RNA < LLOQ at their last on-treatment assessment.

b.Other includes patients who did not achieve SVR and did not meet virologic failure criteria (e.g. lost to follow-up).

c.Patients with missing cirrhosis status were excluded from this subgroup analysis.

d.Metavir score = 4 or Ishak score ≥ 5 by liver biopsy, or FibroTest score of > 0.75 and (APRI) of > 2.

Table 14 presents relapse rates with the 12-week regimens (with or without ribavirin) for selected subgroups (see also previous section “Effect of baseline HCV resistance-associated variants on treatment outcome”). In non-cirrhotic patients relapses only occurred in the presence of baseline NS5A RAVs, and during therapy with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin. In cirrhotic patients relapses occurred with both regimens, and in the absence and presence of baseline NS5A RAVs.

Table 14: Relapse rates for selected subgroups in study ION-2

 

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

LDV/SOF

LDV/SOF+RBV

 

12 weeks

12 weeks

24 weeks

24 weeks

 

(n = 109)

(n = 111)

(n = 109)

(n = 111)

Number of responders at end of

 

 

treatment

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cirrhosis

 

 

 

 

 

 

No

5% (4/86)a

0% (0/88)b

0%

(0/86)b

0%

(0/88)

Yes

14% (3/22)

18% (4/22)

0%

(0/22)

0%

(0/22)

Presence of baseline NS5A resistance-associated substitutionsc

 

 

 

 

No

3% (3/91)d

2% (2/94)

0%

(0/96)

0%

(0/95)f

Yes

24% (4/17)e

12% (2/17)

0%

(0/13)

0%

(0/14)

a.These 4 non-cirrhotic relapsers all had baseline NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms.

b.Patients with missing cirrhosis status were excluded from this subgroup analysis.

c.Analysis (by deep sequencing) included NS5A resistance-associated polymorphisms that conferred > 2.5-fold change in

EC50 (K24G/N/R, M28A/G/T, Q30E/G/H/L/K/R/T, L31I/F/M/V, P32L, S38F, H58D, A92K/T, and Y93C/F/H/N/S for genotype 1a and L31I/F/M/V, P32L, P58D, A92K, and Y93C/H/N/S for genotype 1b HCV infection).

d.3/3 of these patients had cirrhosis.

e.0/4 of these patients had cirrhosis.

f.One patient who achieved a viral load < LLOQ at end of treatment had missing baseline NS5A data and was excluded from the analysis.

Previously treated adults with cirrhosis – SIRIUS – Genotype 1

SIRIUS included patients with compensated cirrhosis who first failed therapy with pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) + ribavirin, and then failed a regimen consisting of a pegylated

interferon + ribavirin + an NS3/4A protease inhibitor. Cirrhosis was defined by biopsy, Fibroscan (> 12.5 kPa) or FibroTest > 0.75 and an AST:platelet ratio index (APRI) of > 2.

The study (double-blind and placebo-controlled) evaluated 24 weeks of treatment ledipasvir/sofosbuvir (with ribavirin placebo) versus 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin. Patients in the latter treatment arm received placebo (for ledipasvir/sofosbuvir and ribavirin) during the first 12 weeks, followed by active blinded therapy during the subsequent

12 weeks. Patients were stratified by HCV genotype (1a versus 1b) and prior treatment response (whether HCV RNA < LLOQ had been achieved).

Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced across the two treatment groups. The median age was 56 years (range: 23 to 77); 74% of patients were male; 97% were white; 63% had genotype 1a HCV infection; 94% had non-CC IL28B alleles (CT or TT).

Of the 155 patients enrolled, 1 patient discontinued treatment whilst on placebo. Of the remaining 154 patients, a total of 149 achieved SVR12 across both treatment groups; 96% (74/77) of patients in the ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin 12-week group and 97% (75/77) of patients in the ledipasvir/sofosbuvir 24-week group. All 5 patients who did not achieve SVR12 relapsed after having end-of-treatment response (see section “Resistance” – “In clinical studies” above).

Previously treated adults who have failed on sofosbuvir + ribavirin ± PEG-IFN

The efficacy of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in patients who had previously failed treatment with sofosbuvir + ribavirin ± PEG-IFN is supported by two clinical studies. In study 1118, 44 patients with genotype 1 infection, including 12 cirrhotic patients, who had previously failed treatment with sofosbuvir + ribavirin + PEG-IFN or with sofosbuvir + ribavirin were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin for 12 weeks; the SVR was 100% (44/44). In study ION-4, 13 HCV/HIV-1 co-infected patients with genotype 1, including 1 cirrhotic patient, who had failed a sofosbuvir + ribavirin regimen were enrolled; the SVR was 100% (13/13) after 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir.

HCV/HIV co-infected adults – ION-4

ION-4 was an open-label clinical study that evaluated the safety and efficacy of 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin in HCV treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients with genotype 1 or 4 CHC who were co-infected with HIV-1. Treatment-experienced patients had failed prior treatment with PEG-IFN + ribavirin ± an HCV protease inhibitor or sofosbuvir +

ribavirin ± PEG-IFN. Patients were on a stable HIV-1 antiretroviral therapy that included emtricitabine/tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, administered with efavirenz, rilpivirine or raltegravir.

The median age was 52 years (range: 26 to 72); 82% of the patients were male; 61% were white; 34% were black; 75% had genotype 1a HCV infection; 2% had genotype 4 infection; 76% had non-CC IL28B alleles (CT or TT); and 20% had compensated cirrhosis. Fifty-five percent (55%) of the patients were treatment-experienced.

Table 15: Response rates in study ION-4

 

LDV/SOF

 

12 weeks

 

(n = 335)

SVR

96%

(321/335)a

Outcome for patients without SVR

 

 

On-treatment virologic failure

< 1% (2/335)

Relapseb

3% (10/333)

Otherc

< 1% (2/335)

SVR rates for selected subgroups

 

 

Patients with cirrhosis

94%

(63/67)

Previously treated patients with cirrhosis

98%

(46/47)

a.8 patients with genotype 4 HCV infection were enrolled in the study with 8/8 achieving SVR12.

b.The denominator for relapse is the number of patients with HCV RNA < LLOQ at their last on-treatment assessment.

c.Other includes patients who did not achieve SVR and did not meet virologic failure criteria (e.g. lost to follow-up).

HCV/HIV co-infected adults – ERADICATE

ERADICATE was an open-label study to evaluate 12 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in 50 patients with genotype 1 CHC co-infected with HIV. All patients were treatment-naïve to HCV therapy without cirrhosis, 26% (13/50) of patients were HIV antiretroviral naïve and 74% (37/50) of patients were receiving concomitant HIV antiretroviral therapy. At the time of the interim analysis 40 patients have reached 12 weeks post treatment and SVR12 was 98% (39/40).

Patients awaiting liver transplantation and post-liver transplant – SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2

SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2 were two open-label clinical studies that evaluated 12 and 24 weeks of treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in combination with ribavirin in genotype 1 and 4 HCV-infected subjects who have undergone liver transplantation and/or who have decompensated liver disease. The two studies were identical in study design. Subjects were enrolled in one of the seven groups based on liver transplantation status and severity of hepatic impairment (see Table 16). Subjects with a CPT score >12 were excluded. Within each group, subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin for 12 or 24 weeks.

Demographics and baseline characteristics were balanced across the treatment groups. Of the 670 treated subjects, the median age was 59 years (range: 21 to 81 years); 77% of the subjects were male; 91% were White; mean body mass index was 28 kg/m2 (range: 18 to 49 kg/m2); 94% and 6% had genotype 1 and 4 HCV infection, respectively; 78% of the subjects failed a prior HCV therapy. Among the subjects who had decompensated cirrhosis (pre- or post-transplant), 64% and 36% were CPT class B and C at screening, respectively, 24% had a baseline Model for End Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score greater than 15.

Table 16: Combined response rates (SVR12) in studies SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2

 

 

LDV/SOF+RBV

 

LDV/SOF+RBV

 

 

12 weeks

 

24 weeks

 

 

(n = 307)a,b

 

(n = 307)a,b

 

SVR

 

 

SVR

 

 

Pre-transplant

 

 

 

 

 

 

CPT B

87%

(45/52)

 

92%

(46/50)

 

CPT C

88%

(35/40)

 

83%

(38/46)

 

Post-transplant

 

 

 

 

 

 

Metavir score F0-F3

95%

(94/99)

 

99%

(99/100)

 

CPT Ac

98%

(55/56)

 

96%

(51/53)

 

CPT Bc

89%

(41/46)

 

96%

(43/45)

 

CPT Cc

57%

(4/7)

 

78%

(7/9)

 

FCH

100% (7/7)

 

100% (4/4)

 

a.Twelve subjects transplanted prior to post-treatment Week 12 with HCV RNA<LLOQ at last measurement prior to transplant were excluded.

b.Two subjects who did not have decompensated cirrhosis and had also not received a liver transplant were excluded due to failure to meet the inclusion criteria for any of the treatment groups.

c.CPT = Child-Pugh-Turcotte, FCH = Fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis. CPT A = CPT score 5-6 (compensated),

CPT B = CPT score 7-9 (decompensated), CPT C = CPT score 10-12 (decompensated).

Forty subjects with genotype 4 CHC were enrolled in SOLAR-1 and SOLAR-2 studies, SVR 12 were 92% (11/12) and 100% (10/10) in post-transplant subjects without decompensated cirrhosis and

60% (6/10) and 75% (6/8) in subjects with decompensated cirrhosis (pre- and post-liver transplantation) treated for 12 or 24 weeks, respectively. Of the 7 subjects who failed to achieve SVR12, 3 relapsed, all had decompensated cirrhosis and were treated with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin for 12 weeks.

Changes in MELD and CPT score from baseline to post-treatment Week 12 were analyzed for all patients with decompensated cirrhosis (pre- or post-transplant) who achieved SVR12 and for whom data were available (n = 123) to assess the effect of SVR12 on hepatic function.

Change in MELD score: Among those who achieved SVR12 with 12 weeks treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin, 57% (70/123) and 19% (23/123) had an improvement or no change in MELD score from baseline to post-treatment week 12, respectively; of the 32 subjects whose MELD score was ≥ 15 at baseline, 59% (19/32) had a MELD score < 15 at post-treatment Week 12. The improvement in MELD scores observed was driven largely by improvements in total bilirubin.

Change in CPT score and class: Among those who achieved SVR12 with 12 weeks treatment with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with ribavirin, 60% (74/123) and 34% (42/123) had an improvement or no change of CPT scores from baseline to post-treatment week 12, respectively; of the 32 subjects who had CPT C cirrhosis at baseline, 53% (17/32) had CPT B cirrhosis at post-treatment Week 12; of the 88 subjects who had CPT B cirrhosis at baseline, 25% (22/88) had CPT A cirrhosis at post-treatment Week 12. The improvement in CPT scores observed was driven largely by improvements in total bilirubin and albumin.

Clinical efficacy and safety in genotype 2, 3, 4, 5 and 6 (see also section 4.4)

Ledipasvir/sofosbuvir has been evaluated for the treatment of non-genotype 1 infection in small Phase 2 studies, as summarised below.

The clinical studies enrolled patients with or without cirrhosis, who were treatment-naïve or with prior treatment failure after therapy with PEG-IFN + ribavirin +/- an HCV protease inhibitor.

For genotype 2, 4, 5 and 6 infection, therapy consisted of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir without ribavirin, given for 12 weeks (Table 17). For genotype 3 infection, ledipasvir/sofosbuvir was given with or without ribavirin, also for 12 weeks (Table 18).

Table 17: Response rates (SVR12) with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for 12 weeks in patients with genotype 2, 4, 5 and 6 HCV infection

Study

GT

n

TEa

 

 

SVR12

 

Relapseb

 

 

 

 

 

Overall

Cirrhosis

 

Study 1468 (LEPTON)

19%

(5/26)

96% (25/26)

100%

(2/2)

0% (0/25)

Study 1119

50%

(22/44)

93% (41/44)

100%

(10/10)

7% (3/44)

Study 1119

49%

(20/41)

93% (38/41)

89% (8/9)

5% (2/40)

Study 0122 (ELECTRON-2)

0% (0/25)

96% (24/25)

100%

(2/2)

4% (1/25)

a.TE: number of treatment-experienced patients.

b.The denominator for relapse is the number of patients with HCV RNA < LLOQ at their last on-treatment assessment.

Table 18: Response rates (SVR12) in patients with genotype 3 infection (ELECTRON-2)

 

 

LDV/SOF+RBV

 

 

LDV/SOF

 

 

12 weeks

 

 

 

12 weeks

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

SVR

 

Relapsea

SVR

Relapsea

Treatment-naïve

100%

(26/26)

0%

(0/26)

64%

(16/25)

33% (8/24)

Patients without cirrhosis

100%

(20/20)

0%

(0/21)

71%

(15/21)

25% (5/20)

Patients with cirrhosis

100%

(6/6)

0%

(0/5)

25%

(1/4)

75% (3/4)

Treatment-experienced

82% (41/50)

16% (8/49)

NS

 

NS

Patients without cirrhosis

89% (25/28)

7%

(2/27)

NS

 

NS

Patients with cirrhosis

73% (16/22)

27% (6/22)

NS

 

NS

NS: not studied.

a. The denominator for relapse is the number of patients with HCV RNA < LLOQ at their last on-treatment assessment.

Paediatric population

The European Medicines Agency has deferred the obligation to submit the results of studies with ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in one or more subsets of the paediatric population in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (see section 4.2 for information on paediatric use).

5.2Pharmacokinetic properties

Absorption

Following oral administration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir to HCV-infected patients, ledipasvir median peak plasma concentration was observed at 4.0 hours post-dose. Sofosbuvir was absorbed quickly and the median peak plasma concentrations were observed ~ 1 hour post-dose. Median peak plasma concentration of GS-331007 was observed at 4 hours post-dose.

Based on the population pharmacokinetic analysis in HCV-infected patients, geometric mean steady-state AUC0-24 for ledipasvir (n = 2,113), sofosbuvir (n = 1,542), and GS-331007 (n = 2,113) were 7,290, 1,320 and 12,000 ng•h/mL, respectively. Steady-state Cmax for ledipasvir, sofosbuvir and GS-331007 were 323, 618 and 707 ng/mL, respectively. Sofosbuvir and GS-331007 AUC0-24 and Cmax were similar in healthy adult subjects and patients with HCV infection. Relative to healthy subjects (n = 191), ledipasvir AUC0-24 and Cmax were 24% lower and 32% lower, respectively, in HCV-infected patients. Ledipasvir AUC is dose proportional over the dose range of 3 to 100 mg. Sofosbuvir and GS-331007 AUCs are near dose proportional over the dose range of 200 mg to 400 mg.

Effects of food

Relative to fasting conditions, the administration of a single dose of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir with a moderate fat or high fat meal increased the sofosbuvir AUC0-inf by approximately 2-fold, but did not significantly affect the sofosbuvir Cmax. The exposures to GS-331007 and ledipasvir were not altered in the presence of either meal type. Harvoni can be administered without regard to food.

Distribution

Ledipasvir is > 99.8% bound to human plasma proteins. After a single 90 mg dose of [14C]-ledipasvir in healthy subjects, the blood to plasma ratio of [14C]-radioactivity ranged between 0.51 and 0.66.

Sofosbuvir is approximately 61-65% bound to human plasma proteins and the binding is independent of drug concentration over the range of 1 μg/mL to 20 μg/mL. Protein binding of GS-331007 was

minimal in human plasma. After a single 400 mg dose of [14C]-sofosbuvir in healthy subjects, the blood to plasma ratio of [14C]-radioactivity was approximately 0.7.

Biotransformation

In vitro, no detectable metabolism of ledipasvir was observed by human CYP1A2, CYP2C8, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Evidence of slow oxidative metabolism via an unknown mechanism has been observed. Following a single dose of 90 mg [14C]-ledipasvir, systemic exposure was almost exclusively due to the parent drug (> 98%). Unchanged ledipasvir is also the major species present in faeces.

Sofosbuvir is extensively metabolised in the liver to form the pharmacologically active nucleoside analogue triphosphate GS-461203. The active metabolite is not observed. The metabolic activation pathway involves sequential hydrolysis of the carboxyl ester moiety catalysed by human cathepsin A or carboxylesterase 1 and phosphoramidate cleavage by histidine triad nucleotide-binding protein 1 followed by phosphorylation by the pyrimidine nucleotide biosynthesis pathway. Dephosphorylation results in the formation of nucleoside metabolite GS-331007 that cannot be efficiently rephosphorylated and lacks anti-HCV activity in vitro. Within ledipasvir/sofosbuvir, GS-331007 accounts for approximately 85% of total systemic exposure.

Elimination

Following a single 90 mg oral dose of [14C]-ledipasvir, mean total recovery of the [14C]-radioactivity in faeces and urine was 87%, with most of the radioactive dose recovered from faeces (86%). Unchanged ledipasvir excreted in faeces accounted for a mean of 70% of the administered dose and the oxidative metabolite M19 accounted for 2.2% of the dose. These data suggest that biliary excretion of unchanged ledipasvir is a major route of elimination with renal excretion being a minor pathway (approximately 1%). The median terminal half-life of ledipasvir in healthy volunteers following administration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir in the fasted state was 47 hours.

Following a single 400 mg oral dose of [14C]-sofosbuvir, mean total recovery of the dose was greater than 92%, consisting of approximately 80%, 14%, and 2.5% recovered in urine, faeces, and expired air, respectively. The majority of the sofosbuvir dose recovered in urine was GS-331007 (78%) while 3.5% was recovered as sofosbuvir. This data indicate that renal clearance is the major elimination pathway for GS-331007 with a large part actively secreted. The median terminal half-lives of sofosbuvir and GS-331007 following administration of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir were 0.5 and 27 hours, respectively.

Neither ledipasvir nor sofosbuvir are substrates for hepatic uptake transporters, organic cation transporter (OCT) 1, organic anion-transporting polypeptide (OATP) 1B1 or OATP1B3. GS-331007 is not a substrate for renal transporters including organic anion transporter (OAT) 1 or OAT3, or OCT2.

In vitro potential for ledipasvir/sofosbuvir to affect other medicinal products

At concentrations achieved in the clinic, ledipasvir is not an inhibitor of hepatic transporters including the OATP 1B1 or 1B3, BSEP, OCT1, OCT2, OAT1, OAT3, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion (MATE) 1 transporter, multidrug resistance protein (MRP) 2 or MRP4. Sofosbuvir and GS-331007 are not inhibitors of drug transporters P-gp, BCRP, MRP2, BSEP, OATP1B1, OATP1B3, OCT1 and GS-331007 is not an inhibitor of OAT1, OCT2 and MATE1.

Sofosbuvir and GS-331007 are not inhibitors or inducers of CYP or uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase (UGT) 1A1 enzymes.

Pharmacokinetics in special populations

Race and gender

No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic differences due to race have been identified for ledipasvir, sofosbuvir or GS-331007. No clinically relevant pharmacokinetic differences due to gender have been identified for sofosbuvir or GS-331007. AUC and Cmax of ledipasvir were 77% and 58% higher,

respectively, in females than males; however, the relationship between gender and ledipasvir exposures was not considered clinically relevant.

Elderly

Population pharmacokinetic analysis in HCV-infected patients showed that within the age range (18 to 80 years) analysed, age did not have a clinically relevant effect on the exposure to ledipasvir, sofosbuvir or GS-331007. Clinical studies of ledipasvir/sofosbuvir included 235 patients (8.6% of total number of patients) aged 65 years and over.

Renal impairment

The pharmacokinetics of ledipasvir were studied with a single dose of 90 mg ledipasvir in

HCV negative patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min by Cockcroft-Gault, median [range] CrCl 22 [17-29] mL/min). No clinically relevant differences in ledipasvir pharmacokinetics were observed between healthy subjects and patients with severe renal impairment.

The pharmacokinetics of sofosbuvir were studied in HCV negative patients with mild (eGFR ≥ 50 and < 80 mL/min/1.73 m2), moderate (eGFR ≥ 30 and < 50 mL/min/1.73 m2), severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and patients with ESRD requiring haemodialysis following a single 400 mg dose of sofosbuvir. Relative to patients with normal renal function (eGFR

> 80 mL/min/1.73 m2), the sofosbuvir AUC0-inf was 61%, 107% and 171% higher in mild, moderate and severe renal impairment, while the GS-331007 AUC0-inf was 55%, 88% and 451% higher, respectively. In patients with ESRD, relative to patients with normal renal function, sofosbuvir AUC0-inf was 28% higher when sofosbuvir was dosed 1 hour before haemodialysis compared with 60% higher when sofosbuvir was dosed 1 hour after haemodialysis. The AUC0-inf of GS-331007 in patients with ESRD administered with sofosbuvir 1 hour before or 1 hour after haemodialysis was at least 10-fold and 20-fold higher, respectively. GS-331007 is efficiently removed by haemodialysis with an extraction coefficient of approximately 53%. Following a single 400 mg dose of sofosbuvir, a 4 hour haemodialysis removed 18% of administered sofosbuvir dose. The safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir have not been established in patients with severe renal impairment or ESRD.

Hepatic impairment

The pharmacokinetics of ledipasvir were studied with a single dose of 90 mg ledipasvir in

HCV negative patients with severe hepatic impairment (CPT class C). Ledipasvir plasma exposure (AUCinf) was similar in patients with severe hepatic impairment and control patients with normal hepatic function. Population pharmacokinetics analysis in HCV-infected patients indicated that cirrhosis (including decompensated cirrhosis) had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure to ledipasvir.

The pharmacokinetics of sofosbuvir were studied following 7-day dosing of 400 mg sofosbuvir in HCV-infected patients with moderate and severe hepatic impairment (CPT class B and C). Relative to patients with normal hepatic function, the sofosbuvir AUC0-24 was 126% and 143% higher in moderate and severe hepatic impairment, while the GS-331007 AUC0-24 was 18% and 9% higher, respectively. Population pharmacokinetics analysis in HCV-infected patients indicated that cirrhosis (including decompensated cirrhosis) had no clinically relevant effect on the exposure to sofosbuvir and GS-331007.

Body weight

Body weight did not have a significant effect on sofosbuvir exposure according to a population pharmacokinetic analysis. Exposure to ledipasvir decreases with increasing body weight but the effect is not considered to be clinically relevant.

Paediatric population

The pharmacokinetics of ledipasvir, sofosbuvir and GS-331007 in paediatric patients have not been established (see section 4.2).

5.3Preclinical safety data

Ledipasvir

No target organs of toxicity were identified in rat and dog studies with ledipasvir at AUC exposures approximately 7 times the human exposure at the recommended clinical dose.

Ledipasvir was not genotoxic in a battery of in vitro or in vivo assays, including bacterial mutagenicity, chromosome aberration using human peripheral blood lymphocytes and in vivo rat micronucleus assays.

Ledipasvir was not carcinogenic in the 6-month rasH2 transgenic mouse study at exposures up to 26-fold higher than human exposure. A carcinogenicity study in rats is ongoing.

Ledipasvir had no adverse effects on mating and fertility. In female rats, the mean number of corpora lutea and implantation sites were slightly reduced at maternal exposures 6-fold the exposure in humans at the recommended clinical dose. At the no observed effect level, AUC exposure to ledipasvir was approximately 7- and 3-fold, in males and females, respectively, the human exposure at the recommended clinical dose.

No teratogenic effects were observed in rat and rabbit developmental toxicity studies with ledipasvir.

In a rat pre- and postnatal study, at a maternally toxic dose, the developing rat offspring exhibited mean decreased body weight and body weight gain when exposed in utero (via maternal dosing) and during lactation (via maternal milk) at a maternal exposure 4 times the exposure in humans at the recommended clinical dose. There were no effects on survival, physical and behavioural development and reproductive performance in the offspring at maternal exposures similar to the exposure in humans at the recommended clinical dose.

When administered to lactating rats, ledipasvir was detected in plasma of suckling rats likely due to excretion of ledipasvir via milk.

Sofosbuvir

In repeat dose toxicology studies in rat and dog, high doses of the 1:1 diastereomeric mixture caused adverse liver (dog) and heart (rat) effects and gastrointestinal reactions (dog). Exposure to sofosbuvir in rodent studies could not be detected likely due to high esterase activity; however, exposure to the major metabolite GS-331007 at doses which cause adverse effects was 16 times (rat) and 71 times (dog) higher than the clinical exposure at 400 mg sofosbuvir. No liver or heart findings were observed in chronic toxicity studies at exposures 5 times (rat) and 16 times (dog) higher than the clinical exposure. No liver or heart findings were observed in the 2-year carcinogenicity studies at exposures 17 times (mouse) and 9 times (rat) higher than the clinical exposure.

Sofosbuvir was not genotoxic in a battery of in vitro or in vivo assays, including bacterial mutagenicity, chromosome aberration using human peripheral blood lymphocytes and in vivo mouse micronucleus assays.

Carcinogenicity studies in mice and rats do not indicate any carcinogenicity potential of sofosbuvir administered at doses up to 600 mg/kg/day in mouse and 750 mg/kg/day in rat. Exposure to GS-331007 in these studies was up to 17 times (mouse) and 9 times (rat) higher than the clinical exposure at 400 mg sofosbuvir.

Sofosbuvir had no effects on embryo-foetal viability or on fertility in rat and was not teratogenic in rat and rabbit development studies. No adverse effects on behaviour, reproduction or development of offspring in rat were reported. In rabbit studies exposure to sofosbuvir was 6 times the expected clinical exposure. In the rat studies, exposure to sofosbuvir could not be determined but exposure margins based on the major human metabolite was approximately 5 times higher than the clinical exposure at 400 mg sofosbuvir.

Sofosbuvir-derived material was transferred through the placenta in pregnant rats and into the milk of lactating rats.

6.PHARMACEUTICAL PARTICULARS

6.1List of excipients

Tablet core

Copovidone

Lactose monohydrate

Microcrystalline cellulose

Croscarmellose sodium

Colloidal anhydrous silica

Magnesium stearate

Film-coating

Polyvinyl alcohol

Titanium dioxide

Macrogol 3350

Talc

Sunset yellow FCF aluminium lake (E110)

6.2Incompatibilities

Not applicable.

6.3Shelf life

3 years.

6.4Special precautions for storage

This medicinal product does not require any special storage conditions.

6.5Nature and contents of container

Harvoni tablets are supplied in high density polyethylene (HDPE) bottles with a polypropylene child-resistant closure containing 28 film-coated tablets with a silica gel desiccant and polyester coil.

The following pack sizes are available: outer cartons containing 1 bottle of 28 film-coated tablets and outer cartons containing 84 (3 bottles of 28) film-coated tablets.

Not all pack sizes may be marketed.

6.6Special precautions for disposal

Any unused medicinal product or waste material should be disposed of in accordance with local requirements.

7.MARKETING AUTHORISATION HOLDER

Gilead Sciences International Ltd.

Cambridge

CB21 6GT

United Kingdom

8.MARKETING AUTHORISATION NUMBER(S)

EU/1/14/958/001

EU/1/14/958/002

9.DATE OF FIRST AUTHORISATION/RENEWAL OF THE AUTHORISATION

Date of first authorisation: 17 November 2014

10.DATE OF REVISION OF THE TEXT

Detailed information on this medicinal product is available on the website of the European Medicines Agency http://www.ema.europa.eu

Comments

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
  • Help
  • Get it on Google Play
  • About
  • Info on site by:

  • Presented by RXed.eu

  • 27558

    prescription drugs listed